Tuberculosis Burden and Determinants of Treatment Outcomes According to Age in Brazil: A Nationwide Study of 896,314 Cases Reported Between 2010 and 2019 is a dataset published in Frontiers in Medicine (2021). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.800, placing it in the top 25.2% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 26 times, with 17 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 15/100.
Ranks in the top 25% for downstream scientific impact
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“the data was extracted from the public database: DataSUS (TABNET)—http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper provides a web URL (http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br) for the data, not a persistent identifier scheme (DOI, Handle, ARK, URN, or repository accession). [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“the data was extracted from the public database: DataSUS (TABNET)”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
DataSUS (TABNET) is named as the holder of the data, but it is not a curated repository listed in re3data/FAIRsharing (it is a governmental health database). [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (2/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
“the data was extracted from the public database: DataSUS (TABNET)—http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The dataset URL appears only in the body text (data availability statement), not as a reference-list entry. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: the data was extracted from the public database: DataSUS (TABNET)—http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br (in Brazilian Portuguese).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The statement points to a URL for a public database, not to a repository record with an accession or persistent identifier. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“SINAN notification forms also collected data on individual characteristics, including clinical (HIV, diabetes, smear, and culture among others) and sociodemographic (sex, age, ethnicity, and literacy) data.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The dataset content is described in running prose, not in an itemised inventory (section, table, or list). [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“the data was extracted from the public database: DataSUS (TABNET)”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The data are stated to be from a public database, with no precondition stated. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“the data was extracted from the public database: DataSUS (TABNET)—http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br (in Brazilian Portuguese).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper labels the data as originating from a 'public database', which is a natural-language equivalent of open access. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“the data was extracted from the public database: DataSUS (TABNET)”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The data are publicly available, so no gatekeeper is named or needed.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
No sentence addresses the timing or persistence of the data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the released data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No community standard (FAIRsharing-registered checklist, ontology, or schema) is named for the data.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No identifier (accession, DOI, RRID, assembly ID, etc.) is given for any external resource the data depend on.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No reuse license is stated for the data (the CC BY license applies to the article, not the data).
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
“access date 9/22/2020”
An access date is given, which pins the snapshot of the data used. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
No code is mentioned or made available.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH U01 AI069923 and NIAID 1 P30AI110527-03)”
Award/grant numbers are provided for the funding.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper describes the source of the data (SINAN) but does not name the specific instruments, assays, or software used to produce the original data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“All variables used in this study are shown in detail in Table 1.”
Variable definitions are provided inside the article (Table 1), not in a separate documentation object shipped with the data. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.494
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.305
From 9 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 17 citers.
NIAID NIH HHS
Grant: U01 AI069923
NIAID NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AI110527
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3U01AI069923-04S1
CCASAnet: Caribbean, Central and South America Network
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5P30AI110527-04
Tennessee Center for AIDS Research (TN-CFAR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
FWCI
1.05
Citation Percentile
0.8%
Influential Citations
1
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals