A Comparative Retrospective Study of Immunotherapy RANO Versus Standard RANO Criteria in Glioblastoma Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy is a research paper published in Frontiers in Oncology (2021). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0. It has been cited 13 times.
Scored on demand from live citation data
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.
NCI NIH HHS
Grant: K12 CA090354
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1R01LM012434-01
Computer aided diagnosis of cancer metastases in the brain
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 2K12CA090354-21
Training Program in Nervous System Tumors
Fields of Study
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals
Additional file 1 of Prognostic value of MRI volumetric parameters in non-small cell lung cancer patients after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: comparison with response assessment criteria
Additional file 1 of Prognostic value of MRI volumetric parameters in non-small cell lung cancer patients after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: comparison with response assessment criteria
Additional file 2 of Prognostic value of MRI volumetric parameters in non-small cell lung cancer patients after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: comparison with response assessment criteria
Additional file 2 of Prognostic value of MRI volumetric parameters in non-small cell lung cancer patients after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: comparison with response assessment criteria
Additional file 3 of Prognostic value of MRI volumetric parameters in non-small cell lung cancer patients after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: comparison with response assessment criteria
Additional file 3 of Prognostic value of MRI volumetric parameters in non-small cell lung cancer patients after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: comparison with response assessment criteria