Cohort Profile: The Assessing Economic Transitions (ASSET) Study—A Community-Based Mixed-Methods Study of Economic Engagement among Inner-City Residents is a dataset published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2022). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.346, placing it in the top 50.6% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 3 times, with 2 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 15/100.
Ranks in the top 51% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
No persistent identifier (DOI, Handle, ARK, or repository accession) is given for the dataset.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
No repository is named as the holder of the data.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier for the dataset appears anywhere in the paper, either in a reference-list entry or in body text. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Study data and the data dictionary will not be publicly available because of the sensitivity of distributing data gathered from disadvantaged participants engaged in criminalized behaviour. The sharing of data will be considered by application to the study principal investigator and corresponding author at [email protected] on a case-by-case basis.”
The statement points to a person (Colavizza category 1), not a repository record.
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“Table A1 Table of measures.”
The paper provides an itemised inventory (a table) of the dataset's variables. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“Study data and the data dictionary will not be publicly available because of the sensitivity of distributing data gathered from disadvantaged participants engaged in criminalized behaviour. The sharing of data will be considered by application to the study principal investigator and corresponding author at [email protected] on a case-by-case basis. In cases where requests to access study data are approved, the data dictionary and deidentified participant data, including only variables relevant to the application, will be provided. Access criteria for the data include release only to researchers with investigator support after approval of a proposal with a signed data access agreement and upon proof of completion of the requisite data protection protocols.”
The text provides a followable process with preconditions (application, signed data access agreement, proof of data protection protocols), so it is a specified access process rather than unconditional open access or a bare request to a person. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
No access-level label is applied to the data; the text describes a controlled-access procedure but does not use a standard vocabulary term. [majority verdict 'no' (2/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“The sharing of data will be considered by application to the study principal investigator and corresponding author at [email protected] on a case-by-case basis.”
The gatekeeper is a natural person (the principal investigator), not an institutional body.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
Neither a persistence commitment nor an availability timing is stated for the data.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the released data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No data or metadata community standard (e.g., MIAME, MINSEQE, ISA-Tab) is named.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No identifier (accession, DOI, RRID, etc.) for any external resource is given.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No reuse licence is named for the data; the article's CC BY licence does not apply to the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
“As of 2 May 2022, 257 participants had completed a total of 1654 study visits”
A specific date pins the snapshot of the data, but no version token is given. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
No code availability statement or locator is provided.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This study is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; PJT-178101) as well as the CIHR Foundation Grant (FDN-154320)”
Award/grant numbers are explicitly stated alongside the funder names. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“All analyses were conducted using R 4.2.0”
The paper names specific software (R 4.2.0) and a data capture system (REDCap), which are proper-noun provenance tokens. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“Table A1 Table of measures.”
Variable definitions are provided inside the article (Appendix A table), not as a separate documentation object travelling with the data. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.208
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.138
From 1 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 2 citers.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Grant: PJT-178101
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Grant: FDN-154320
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Grant: U01DA038886
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Grant: U01DA021525
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01DA021525-15
Impacts of universal access to HIV/AIDS care among HIV+ injection drug users
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Grant: unidentified
unidentified
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3U01DA038886-02S1
Vancouver Drug Users Study: Evaluating the Natural History of Injection Drug Use
Fields of Study
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals