Availability of Physical Activity Tracking Data from Wearable Devices for Glaucoma Patients is a dataset published in Information (2023). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.299, placing it in the top 55.2% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 4 times, with 4 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 4/100.
Ranks in the top 55% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
The paper provides a DOI for the article itself but no persistent identifier for any dataset it produced.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
No repository is named as holding the study's own data, because no such data were deposited.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier for the study's own dataset appears anywhere in the paper.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
The data-availability statement refers to the external datasets accessed, not to any dataset produced by this study.
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
The paper contains no itemised inventory or description of its own dataset; it only describes the external datasets it reviewed. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
The paper offers no route to the study's own data; it only describes access to external datasets. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper does not state any access level label for its own data; it only describes access conditions for the external datasets it reviewed.
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
The paper does not address any gatekeeper for its own data, as no sensitive data were generated by this study.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
The paper says nothing about the timing or persistence of its own data.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
The paper names no file format for its own data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No data- or metadata-community standard is named for the study's own data.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
The paper does not provide a persistent identifier for any external resource that its own data depend on; it only names databases and cites articles in the reference list.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No license is attached to the study's own data; the CC BY license applies to the article only. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date is given for the study's own data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
The paper does not provide any code locator for its own analysis.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This study was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants T35 EY033704, DP5OD029610, P30EY022589, R01EY034146, R01MD014850, and an unrestricted departmental grant from Research to Prevent Blindness.”
The paper explicitly lists NIH grant numbers and a departmental grant for the work. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper describes literature search methods, but not the production of a dataset. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
No documentation object is named for the study's own data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.241
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.0575
From 2 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 4 citers.
National Institutes of Health
Grant: T35 EY033704
National Institutes of Health
Grant: DP5OD029610
National Institutes of Health
Grant: P30EY022589
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01EY034146
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01MD014850
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD026554
NIH HHS
Grant: U24 OD023176
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD025315
NIH HHS
Grant: U2C OD023196
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD026549
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD026550
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD026555
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD026557
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD025277
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD023205
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD026548
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD026552
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD026553
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD025276
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD026551
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD023206
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD025337
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD026556
NIH HHS
Grant: U24 OD023121
NIH HHS
Grant: U24 OD023163
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01MD014850-04
iGLAMOUR Study: Innovations in Glaucoma Adherence and monitoring Of Under-Represented minorities
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD025277-02S1
Healthy Americas: All of Us Research Program
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01EY034146-03
Multimodal Artificial Intelligence to Predict Glaucomatous Progression and Surgical Intervention
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5DP5OD029610-03
Multi-modal Health Information Technology Innovations for Precision Management of Glaucoma
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD023205-01S1
Communications Design and Development for NIH Precision Medicine Initiative Research Projects
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1OT2OD026549-01
University of Arizona-Banner Health All of Us Research Program
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1OT2OD026553-01
The New England Precision Medicine Consortium of the All of Us Research Program
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U24OD023163-02
Adaptive Platform for Personalized Engagement
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD026548-01S1
Southern All of Us Network
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1OT2OD025315-01
Empowerment-focused Outreach, Education and Enrollment of Tennessee Older Adults in the All of Us Research Program through Community Efforts by FiftyForward
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD023206-01S2
Communication Implementation and Coordination for NIH Precision Medicine Initiative Research Projects
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5T35EY033704-03
Short-Term Research training In Vision and Eye health (STRIVE)
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD026557-01S5
Illinois Precision Medicine Consortium
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD026550-01S3
Trans-America Consortium of the Health Care Systems Research Network for the All of Us Research Program
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD026554-01S2
All of Us Pennsylvania
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD026556-01S2
New York City Consortium for Precision Medicine
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD025276-02S7
PRIDEnet for the All of Us Research Program
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD025337-01S3
Research Matters: Creating Possibilities to Achieve Health and Wellness for All of Us Research Program
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3U24OD023121-02S1
Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Program Biobank
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1P30EY022589-01
Computational Ophthalmology
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U2COD023196-04
Data and Research Support Center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U24OD023176-04
Technology to Empower Changes in Health (TECH) Network Participant Technologies Center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD026555-01S5
All of Us Wisconsin
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD026551-01S1
SouthEast Enrollment Center (SEEC)
FWCI
0.89
Citation Percentile
0.7%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals