Using Multi-Modal Electronic Health Record Data for the Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Long COVID Using the Super Learner Algorithm is a dataset published in Journal of Clinical Medicine (2023). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.357, placing it in the top 49.6% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 6 times, with 6 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 33/100.
Ranks in the top 50% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“https://precisionhealth.umich.edu/tools-resources/data-access-tools/”
The paper gives a web URL as the location of the data, not a persistent identifier from a recognized PID scheme (DOI, Handle, ARK, or repository accession).
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“University of Michigan Precision Health Analytics Platform”
The named holder is an institutional platform, not a curated repository listed in re3data or FAIRsharing.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
“Data cannot be shared publicly due to patient confidentiality. The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from the University of Michigan Precision Health Analytics Platform at https://precisionhealth.umich.edu/tools-resources/data-access-tools/ accessed on 28 September 2023 for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.”
The dataset's identifier (URL) appears only in the body text of the paper, not in a reference-list entry. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data cannot be shared publicly due to patient confidentiality. The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from the University of Michigan Precision Health Analytics Platform at https://precisionhealth.umich.edu/tools-resources/data-access-tools/ accessed on 28 September 2023 for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.”
The data-availability statement points to a third-party platform for researchers who meet criteria, not to a repository record with an accession or DOI.
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“Our dataset includes multi-modal data encompassing three primary domains: medical phenotype data (signs, symptoms, and diagnoses), medication records, and laboratory biomarker measurements.”
The data content is described in running prose, not in an itemised inventory (section, table, or list). [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“Data cannot be shared publicly due to patient confidentiality. The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from the University of Michigan Precision Health Analytics Platform at https://precisionhealth.umich.edu/tools-resources/data-access-tools/ accessed on 28 September 2023 for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.”
The access route carries a precondition ('researchers who meet the criteria'), which is a stated, followable process (controlled-access procedure). [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data cannot be shared publicly due to patient confidentiality. The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from the University of Michigan Precision Health Analytics Platform at https://precisionhealth.umich.edu/tools-resources/data-access-tools/ accessed on 28 September 2023 for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.”
The paper does not label the access level explicitly but describes an access action (the platform and criteria) from which the restricted access level can be inferred.
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from the University of Michigan Precision Health Analytics Platform”
The University of Michigan Precision Health Analytics Platform is an institutional gatekeeper that controls access to the sensitive patient data.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
The paper states neither a retention period nor a timing of availability beyond the access date; no persistence commitment or availability timing is given. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the released data anywhere in the text.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
“International Classification of Diseases (ICD; ninth and tenth editions)”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper names ICD as a standard vocabulary applied to the data, which is a community standard. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No identifier (accession, DOI, RRID, assembly ID) is given for any external resource that the data depend on or derive from.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No licence or terms of use are named for the data; the paper's CC BY license applies only to the article.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
Neither a version token nor a date identifying a specific snapshot of the data is stated. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
The paper does not provide any locator for the study's own code; code availability is not addressed.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“DMS-1712933”
The paper gives a specific grant number (NSF DMS-1712933) attached to a named funder.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“We used electronic health record data from a comprehensive cohort of 92,301 COVID-19-positive patients who received care at Michigan Medicine”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The data production is described in generic terms (EHR data) without naming specific instruments, kits, or software versions used to generate the data. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (2/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“We focused on 42 specific laboratory traits that have been commonly analyzed for their association with COVID-19 prognosis (Table S1).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
Variable definitions (lab measurements) are listed in a supplementary table inside the article, not in a documentation object shipped with the data. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.292
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.0651
From 3 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 6 citers.
National Institutes of Health/NIH
Grant: P30CA046592
National Institutes of Health/NIH
Grant: K08HL155407
National Institutes of Health/NIH
Grant: U063790
National Institutes of Health/NIH
Grant: DMS-1712933
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5K08HL155407-03
Characterizing the Impact of Fragmented Care in Acute Respiratory Failure
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3P30CA046592-31S7
Cancer Center Support Grant 2018-2023
National Science Foundation
Grant: 1712933
High Dimensional Mediation Analysis with Multi-Omics Data
FWCI
0.95
Citation Percentile
0.8%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals