Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion and Primary Graft Dysfunction Following Lung Transplantation: A Contemporary United Network for Organ Sharing Database Analysis is a dataset published in Journal of Clinical Medicine (2024). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.380, placing it in the top 47.6% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 8 times, with 4 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 4/100.
Ranks in the top 48% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
The paper gives no persistent identifier for its own dataset; only the UNOS source database URL is mentioned.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
The paper does not name a repository that holds the study's own data; it only refers to the source UNOS database.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier for the study's own dataset appears anywhere in the paper.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Restrictions apply to the availability of these data.Data were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and are available at https://unos.org/data/ with the permission of them.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The Data Availability Statement points to the third-party source database with restrictions, not to a repository record for the study's own data. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (2/4 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
The paper does not contain an itemized inventory of the dataset; variables are described in prose and tables as part of the analysis, not as a separate dataset description. [majority verdict 'no' (2/4 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“Restrictions apply to the availability of these data.Data were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and are available at https://unos.org/data/ with the permission of them.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The text states a precondition (permission from UNOS) for accessing the source data, and the study's own data are not deposited. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/4 passes agreed)]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Restrictions apply to the availability of these data.Data were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and are available at https://unos.org/data/ with the permission of them.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper states that the original data are available from UNOS with permission, but does not apply an explicit access-level label from the standard vocabulary. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/4 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“Restrictions apply to the availability of these data. Data were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and are available at https://unos.org/data/ with the permission of them.”
The paper does not name a gatekeeper for the study's own data; it only mentions the source data's gatekeeper (UNOS). [majority verdict 'no' (3/4 passes agreed)]
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
No sentence in the paper states when the data become available or how long they persist.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the study's own data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No data or metadata community standard from FAIRsharing is named; the ISHLT definition of PGD is a clinical standard, not a data/metadata standard. [majority verdict 'no' (3/4 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
The paper does not provide an identifier for any non-own resource that the data depend on; the UNOS URL is a link, not a persistent identifier. [majority verdict 'no' (3/4 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No license is mentioned for the study's data; the CC BY license applies to the article, not the data. [majority verdict 'no' (3/4 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date is given for the study's own data.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
No code availability statement or locator is provided.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This research was generously supported through Dr. Whitson’s National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant R01HL143000.”
The paper provides a specific grant number (R01HL143000) attached to a named funder.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“All statistical analyses were performed with R version 3.6.2 (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria) and Microsoft Excel (Redmond, WA, USA).”
The text names specific software versions (R 3.6.2, Microsoft Excel) used to produce the analysis. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/4 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
Variable definitions are provided in the article's tables and methods, but no documentation object is stated to accompany the data. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.330
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.0503
From 2 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 4 citers.
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Grant: R01HL143000
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01HL143000-02
Preservation and Rescue of The Lung Donor Allograft for Transplantation
The Ohio State University
Jewel and Frank Benson Family Endowment
FWCI
3.49
Citation Percentile
0.9%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals