🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

Knowledge Network Embedding of Transcriptomic Data from Spaceflown Mice Uncovers Signs and Symptoms Associated with Terrestrial Diseases

Life(2021)10.3390/life11010042Source: DataRank Database

Knowledge Network Embedding of Transcriptomic Data from Spaceflown Mice Uncovers Signs and Symptoms Associated with Terrestrial Diseases is a dataset published in Life (2021). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.0, placing it in the top 41.4% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 20 times, with 8 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 39/100.

Top 41%percentile
1.0DataRank
1.0Top 41%
Dataset Open Access20 citations · base score 3.0
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

There has long been an interest in understanding how the hazards from spaceflight may trigger or exacerbate human diseases. With the goal of advancing our knowledge on physiological changes during space travel, NASA GeneLab provides an open-source repository of multi-omics data from real and simulated spaceflight studies. Alone, this data enables identification of biological changes during spaceflight, but cannot infer how that may impact an astronaut at the phenotypic level. To bridge this gap, Scalable Precision Medicine Oriented Knowledge Engine (SPOKE), a heterogeneous knowledge graph connecting biological and clinical data from over 30 databases, was used in combination with GeneLab transcriptomic data from six studies. This integration identified critical symptoms and physiological changes incurred during spaceflight.

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (1/2)
  • Open Access
Interoperable (0/2)
    Reusable (1/3)
    • Dataset classification

    FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

    39FAIR score
    F Findable
    53
    A Accessible
    55
    I Interoperable
    25
    R Reusable
    25
    Top 80% by FAIRLLM-assessed✓ full text read

    Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →

    DataRank Breakdown

    Base Score 43%Citation Network 57%

    Base Score Contribution

    0.449

    From this paper's citation signal

    Citation Network Contribution

    0.596

    From 7 citing papers with measurable signal

    Learn more about DataRank methodology →

    Top 5 citers driving the network score

    Ranked by citation count — the same ordering the engine uses when summing log1p(Cq) over citers.

    1. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
      Bioinformatics201355,202 citationsDataRank 1.6
    2. On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other
      The Annals of Mathematical Statistics194713,652 citationsDataRank 1.4
    Why this DataRank?

    DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 43% comes from its base citations and 57% from the citation network (7 citing papers contributed measurable signal).

    Base score B(p)
    log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
    Network N(p)
    Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
    Damping factor d = 0.85
    DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
    Self-citations excluded
    Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

    Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

    Read the full methodology →

    Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.

    Node colors:CenterData PaperData + Open AccessNon-dataSelected & links| Node size = percentile rank

    Authors (8)

    Related Papers (8)

    Generative adversarial networks
    N/A
    1.4DataRank · unranked
    Communications of the ACM(2020)
    co-cited
    10.1145/3422622
    Nature Genetics(2013)
    co-cited
    10.1038/ng.2653
    "Why Should I Trust You?"
    N/A
    1.4DataRank · unranked
    Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining(2016)
    co-cited
    10.1145/2939672.2939778