Association of Dietary Protein Intake with Muscle Mass in Elderly Chinese: A Cross-Sectional Study is a dataset published in Nutrients (2022). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.768, placing it in the top 26.2% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 16 times, with 16 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 4/100.
Ranks in the top 26% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
The paper does not provide a persistent identifier for its own dataset; the article DOI is not a data identifier.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
No repository is named for the study's own data; the CHNS is a data source, not a repository for this study's data.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier for the dataset appears in the reference list or body text, as the study's own data are not deposited.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data sharing is not applicable to this article.”
The data availability statement declares the data cannot be shared and offers no route, which corresponds to the 'no' verdict.
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
The paper does not include an itemized inventory of its own dataset; it describes the CHNS data but not its own analysis output.
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
The paper declares data sharing is not applicable, providing no route to access the data.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper does not label the access level of the data; it states only that data sharing is not applicable.
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
The paper does not name a gatekeeper for its own data, as no data are shared.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
The paper makes no statement about when the data are available or how long they persist.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the released data, as the data are not released.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper does not name a FAIRsharing-registered data or metadata standard applied to its own data.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
The paper does not provide an identifier for the CHNS dataset or any other external resource used; it cites the CHNS cohort profile but no accession or DOI.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No license is named for the study's data; the article's CC BY license applies to the article, not the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date is given for the study's own data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
The paper does not provide a locator for its own code; it mentions SAS 9.4 but no code availability.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82103848); Chinese institute of food science and technology (2020-09); the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (R01-HD30880, DK056350, R24 HD050924, and R01-HD38700); the NIH Fogarty International Center (5D43TW007709 and 5D43TW009077)”
The paper provides specific award numbers for multiple funders, satisfying the 'yes' verdict. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper describes methods used in the CHNS (e.g., BIA, dietary recalls), but these are not the paper's own data production; the paper's own data are analytical results, not described. [majority verdict 'no' (2/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
No documentation object is named that accompanies the data; the paper does not define its own data fields. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.425
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.343
From 13 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 16 citers.
the National Natural Science Foundation of China
Grant: 82103848
the National Natural Science Foundation of China
Grant: 2020-09
the National Natural Science Foundation of China
Grant: R01-HD30880
the National Natural Science Foundation of China
Grant: DK056350
the National Natural Science Foundation of China
Grant: R24 HD050924
the National Natural Science Foundation of China
Grant: R01-HD38700
the National Natural Science Foundation of China
Grant: 5D43TW007709
the National Natural Science Foundation of China
Grant: 5D43TW009077
the National Natural Science Foundation of China
Grant: 5 R24 HD050924
FIC NIH HHS
Grant: D43 TW007709
FIC NIH HHS
Grant: D43 TW009077
NIDDK NIH HHS
Grant: P30 DK056350
NICHD NIH HHS
Grant: R01 HD038700
NICHD NIH HHS
Grant: R01 HD030880
NIH HHS
Grant: R01-HD30880, DK056350, R24 HD050924, and R01-HD38700
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3P30DK056350-19S1
Nutrition Obesity Research Center (NORC)
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3R24HD050924-05S1
Carolina Population Center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3R01HD038700-03S1
CHILD HEALTH EFFECTS OF RAPID SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5D43TW007709-02
Nutrition-Related NCD Policy Research Training in China
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01HD030880-12
Monitoring Social Change: Health, Reproduction, Aging
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5D43TW009077-04
Nutrition-Related NCD Prevention Training in China
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals