The Camden Study—A Pregnancy Cohort Study of Pregnancy Complications and Birth Outcomes in Camden, New Jersey, USA is a dataset published in Nutrients (2024). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.107, placing it in the top 72.5% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 1 time, with 1 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 13/100.
Ranks in the top 72% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“Data are available upon reasonable request.”
The paper provides no persistent identifier for the dataset; the only identifier is the article's DOI, which does not identify the data.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“Data are available upon reasonable request.”
No repository is named; the data are held by the research team and accessed through the authors.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier or link for the dataset appears anywhere in the paper, either in the reference list or body text. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data are available upon reasonable request.”
The data-availability statement points to the authors (request-based), not a repository record; this corresponds to Colavizza category 1. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“Table 1. Measures collected in the Camden Study.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper contains itemised tables (Table 1 and Table 2) that list the measures and biospecimens, constituting an itemised inventory of the dataset. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“Data are available upon reasonable request.”
The access route requires a request and assessment by the Executive Committee, which is a defined followable process, not unconditional. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data are available upon reasonable request.”
The paper describes the access action (request to authors) but does not apply any explicit access-level label such as 'open' or 'restricted'.
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“Data access requests will be assessed by the Executive Committee of the Camden Study.”
The paper names an institutional gatekeeper (the Executive Committee) that reviews access requests, not a natural person.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
The paper does not state when the data become available or how long they persist; it only says 'available upon reasonable request' without any temporal commitment.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
The paper does not name any file format for the released data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No community data or metadata standard (e.g., MIAME, BIDS, an ontology) is named; only clinical standards like ADA criteria appear.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No identifier for an external resource (e.g., database accession, software DOI) is given; the paper only cites references in the usual bibliography.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No license is mentioned for the data; the CC BY license applies only to the article.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date is given for the dataset; the data are simply 'available upon request' without a snapshot identifier. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
The paper does not mention any code or software produced by the study.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“The Camden Study was supported by historical grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01HD018269/Scholl; R01ES007437/Scholl; R01HD038329/Scholl; R21DK078865/Chen; R21HD058128/Scholl; R21HD061763/Chen; R01MD007828/Chen) with additional current support provided by P30ES005022.”
The paper lists specific award numbers (e.g., R01HD018269) attached to named funders.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“To evaluate growth (particularly with respect to adolescent pregnancy), at study entry and again at the postpartum visit, a knee height measuring device (KHMD) was used to non-invasively measure the length of the mother’s lower leg (with 0.5 mm resolution) with four replicates collected.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper names specific instruments and devices (e.g., KHMD, Hologic bone ultrasound) used to produce the data. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“Table 1. Measures collected in the Camden Study.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
Variable definitions are provided inside the article in tables, but no codebook or README is said to accompany the data deposit. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.104
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
3.04 × 10⁻³
From 1 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 1 citer.
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01HD018269/Scholl
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01ES007437/Scholl
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01HD038329/Scholl
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R21DK078865/Chen
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R21HD058128/Scholl
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R21HD061763/Chen
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01MD007828/Chen
National Institutes of Health
Grant: P30ES005022
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01HD038329-04
OXIDATIVE STRESS, ANTIOXIDANT STATUS &PREGNANCY OUTCOME
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R21DK078865-02
Impaired Glucose Challenge Test & Maternal-Fetal Outcomes
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 4R01MD007828-04
Fatty acids-mediated inflammation and ethnic disparity in pregnancy outcome
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5P30ES005022-18
Research Center in Environmental Health Sciences
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R21HD058128-02
Vitamin D status in pregnant women
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01HD018269-14
ADOLESCENT PREGNANCY: NUTRITION, GROWTH AND OUTCOME
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01ES007437-04
LEAD MOBILIZATION &BONE TURNOVER IN PREGNANCY/LACTATION
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R21HD061763-02
Cardiovascular risk factors and preterm delivery
Fields of Study
Keywords