Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

Behavior Research Methods(2007)10.3758/bf03193146Source: DataRank Database

G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences is a research paper published in Behavior Research Methods (2007). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.7. It has been cited 62,753 times.

N/A

1.7DataRank · unranked

Scored on demand from live citation data

Open Access62,753 citations

Download PDF

Cite:

Linked data & code

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:Impact (FWCI 419.66)OA: bronzeTopics (35)Linked Datasets (25)DataCite Reuse (25)IDs (PubMed, OpenAlex)

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (2/2)

Has DOI
Indexed in repositories

Accessible (1/2)

Open Access

Interoperable (2/2)

DataCite relations
Linked datasets

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

DataRank Breakdown

Base Score 100%Citation Network 0%

Base Score Contribution

1.7

From this paper's citation signal

Citation Network Contribution

Citation network not refreshed for this result

This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.

Learn more about DataRank methodology →

Authors (4)

Edgar Erdfelder ORCID,Albert-Georg Lang,Axel Buchner ORCID,Franz Faul ORCID

Live enrichment

PubMed:17695343 OpenAlex:https://openalex.org/W2087484885

FWCI

419.66

Citation Percentile

1.0%

Citation Trend

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

bronzeLicense: http://www.springer.com/tdm

journalhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758%2FBF03193146.pdf

publisherhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758%2FBF03193146.pdf

publisherhttp://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/BF03193146.pdf

publisherhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03193146/fulltext.html

publisherhttp://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/BF03193146

Fields of Study

Behavioral and Psychological StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentCognitive Abilities and TestingAlgorithmsBehavioral SciencesBiomedical ResearchData Interpretation, StatisticalMathematical ComputingMicrocomputersSensitivity and SpecificitySocial SciencesSoftwareStatistics, Nonparametric

MeSH Terms

AlgorithmsBehavioral SciencesData Interpretation, StatisticalMathematical ComputingMicrocomputersSensitivity and SpecificitySocial SciencesSoftwareStatistics, NonparametricBiomedical Research

Keywords

Statistical powerPower (physics)Computer scienceStatistical analysisPower analysisExtension (predicate logic)Statistical hypothesis testingTest (biology)StatisticsProgramming languageMathematicsComputer security

Additional file 1 of The acceptability of screening for Carbapenemase Producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE): cross-sectional survey of nursing staff and the general publics’ perceptions

10.6084/m9.figshare.7379138.v2figshare

Additional file 1 of The acceptability of screening for Carbapenemase Producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE): cross-sectional survey of nursing staff and the general publics’ perceptions

10.6084/m9.figshare.7379138figshare

Additional file 2 of The acceptability of screening for Carbapenemase Producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE): cross-sectional survey of nursing staff and the general publics’ perceptions

10.6084/m9.figshare.7379141.v2figshare

Additional file 2 of The acceptability of screening for Carbapenemase Producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE): cross-sectional survey of nursing staff and the general publics’ perceptions

10.6084/m9.figshare.7379141figshare

Additional file 1 of Attributional and attentional bias in children with conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits: a case–control study

10.6084/m9.figshare.11967189.v1figshare

Additional file 1 of Attributional and attentional bias in children with conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits: a case–control study

10.6084/m9.figshare.11967189figshare

Additional file 2 of Attributional and attentional bias in children with conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits: a case–control study

10.6084/m9.figshare.11967195.v1figshare

Additional file 2 of Attributional and attentional bias in children with conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits: a case–control study

10.6084/m9.figshare.11967195figshare

Additional file 3 of Attributional and attentional bias in children with conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits: a case–control study

10.6084/m9.figshare.11967204.v1figshare

Additional file 3 of Attributional and attentional bias in children with conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits: a case–control study

10.6084/m9.figshare.11967204figshare

Additional file 1 of Evaluation of TNF-α genetic polymorphisms as predictors for sepsis susceptibility and progression

10.6084/m9.figshare.11986548.v1figshare

Additional file 1 of Evaluation of TNF-α genetic polymorphisms as predictors for sepsis susceptibility and progression

10.6084/m9.figshare.11986548figshare

Additional file 1 of Avatar-based versus conventional vital sign display in a central monitor for monitoring multiple patients: a multicenter computer-based laboratory study

10.6084/m9.figshare.12033102.v1figshare

Additional file 1 of Avatar-based versus conventional vital sign display in a central monitor for monitoring multiple patients: a multicenter computer-based laboratory study

10.6084/m9.figshare.12033102figshare

Additional file 1 of Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) compared to enhanced treatment as usual (E-TAU) for suicidal patients in an inpatient setting: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

10.6084/m9.figshare.12177960.v1figshare

10.6084/m9.figshare.12177960figshare

Additional file 2 of Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) compared to enhanced treatment as usual (E-TAU) for suicidal patients in an inpatient setting: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

10.6084/m9.figshare.12177966.v1figshare

10.6084/m9.figshare.12177966figshare

Additional file 3 of Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) compared to enhanced treatment as usual (E-TAU) for suicidal patients in an inpatient setting: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

10.6084/m9.figshare.12177972.v1figshare

10.6084/m9.figshare.12177972figshare