Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100)

arXiv (Cornell University)(2013)10.48550/arxiv.1306.4454Source: DataRank Database

Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100) is a research paper published in arXiv (Cornell University) (2013). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

Scored on demand from live citation data

Open Access0 citations

Free full text

Cite:

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:Funding (1 grants)OA: greenTopics (30)IDs (PubMed, OpenAlex)

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (1/2)

Has DOI

Accessible (1/2)

Open Access

Interoperable (0/2)

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

Authors (3)

Loet Leydesdorff ORCID,Jian Wang ORCID,Lutz Bornmann ORCID

Live enrichment

PubMed:21097893 OpenAlex:https://openalex.org/W2953015842

Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)

Grant: 10117

Multiscale model adaptation for dynamic performance of multiphase materials.

greenLicense: Elsevier TDM

repositoryhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1306.4454

repositoryhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1306.4454

repositoryhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1306.4454

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.09.003

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1306.4454

Fields of Study

scientometrics and bibliometrics researchMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsDigital Libraries (cs.DL)Applications (stat.AP)FOS: Computer and information sciences62Pxx05 social sciences0509 other social sciences

Keywords

PercentileCitationCitation impactPercentile rankRank (graph theory)StatisticsParametric statisticsComputer scienceSet (abstract data type)MathematicsEconometricsInformation retrievalLibrary scienceCombinatoricsFOS: Computer and information sciences33062Pxx610Computer Science - Digital LibrariesDigital Libraries (cs.DL)Applications (stat.AP)Statistics - Applications