Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

Burden of proof – How to handle a possible need for facilitating the victim’s burden of proof for AI damage?

Liability for AI(2023)10.5040/9781509973934.0013Source: DataRank Database

Burden of proof – How to handle a possible need for facilitating the victim’s burden of proof for AI damage? is a research paper published in Liability for AI (2023). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

Scored on demand from live citation data

0 citations

Free full text

Cite:

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:OA: closedTopics (8)IDs (PubMed, OpenAlex)

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (1/2)

Has DOI

Accessible (0/2)

Interoperable (0/2)

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

Authors (1)

Dr. Eugenia Dacoronia

Live enrichment

PubMed:19910364 OpenAlex:https://openalex.org/W4401265554

closed

http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781509973934.0013

Fields of Study

Ethics and Social Impacts of AIAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningLaw, AI, and Intellectual Property

Keywords

Burden of proofProof of conceptComputer sciencePolitical scienceLaw

Burden of proof – How to handle a possible need for facilitating the victim’s burden of proof for AI damage?

FAIR Checklist

Authors (1)

Open Access

Topics