Frictionless Tabular data package for GC-MS data from Rose Genome article published in Nature genetics, June, 2018 is a dataset (2019). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.104, placing it in the top 62.1% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 1 time. Its calibrated FAIR score is 43/100.
This dataset, in the form of a Frictionless Tabular Data Package (https://frictionlessdata.io/specs/tabular-data-package/), holds the measurements of 61 known metabolites (all annotated with resolvable CHEBI identifiers and InChi), measured by gas chromatography mass-spectrometry (GC-MS) in 6 different Rose cultivars (all annotated with resolvable NCBITaxId) and 3 organism parts (all annotated with resolvable Plant Ontology identifiers). The data was extracted from a supplementary material table, available from https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41588-018-0110-3/MediaObjects/41588_2018_110_MOESM3_ESM.zip and published alongside the Nature Genetics manuscript identified by the following doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0110-3, published in June 2018. This dataset is used to demonstrate how to make data Findeable, Accessible, Discoverable and Interoperable(FAIR) and how Tabular Data Package representations can be easily mobilized for re-analysis and data science. It is associated to the following project available from github at: https://github.com/proccaserra/rose2018ng-notebook with all necessary information and Jupyter notebooks.
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.104
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
Citation network not refreshed for this result
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 100% comes from its base citations and 0% from the citation network.
Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.