Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

"We and they, and both of us:Investigating forms of dual identification in MNCs"

Academy of Management Proceedings(2016)10.5465/ambpp.2016.13765abstractSource: DataRank Database

"We and they, and both of us:Investigating forms of dual identification in MNCs" is a research paper published in Academy of Management Proceedings (2016). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

Scored on demand from live citation data

0 citations

Free full text

Cite:

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:OA: closedTopics (13)IDs (PubMed, OpenAlex)

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (1/2)

Has DOI

Accessible (0/2)

Interoperable (0/2)

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

Authors (4)

Kristiina Mäkelä,Jennie Sumelius,Davina E. Vora,Sofia John

Live enrichment

PubMed:23304386 OpenAlex:https://openalex.org/W2765200542

closed

publisherhttps://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/ambpp.2016.13765abstract

journalhttps://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2016.13765abstract

Fields of Study

Management and Organizational Studies

Keywords

Identification (biology)Multinational corporationDual (grammatical number)Organizational identificationBusinessKnowledge managementPsychologyComputer scienceSocial psychologyLinguisticsOrganizational commitmentFinance

"We and they, and both of us:Investigating forms of dual identification in MNCs"

FAIR Checklist

Authors (4)

Open Access

Topics