Hans‐Dieter Daniel

Decision SciencesSocial SciencesArts and Humanities

Pilot corpus only

This score is computed over theSindex pilot corpus and does not cover the full scientific literature. Scores are relative to papers we have ingested — papers, authors, and institutions outside the pilot are not represented. Methodology.

Top 100%percentile

0Author DataRank

Indexed papers

0in pilot corpus

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Papers

Driven by 53 papers. Top paper: “Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches”.

Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches

Review of Educational Research(2009)10.3102/0034654309334143

N/A

6.8DataRank · unranked

179 citations

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Alison O’Mara, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Alison O’Mara-Eves +1 more

Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants

Scientometrics(2006)10.1007/s11192-006-0121-1

N/A

5.9DataRank · unranked

119 citations

Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry—Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts

Journal of Informetrics(2009)10.1016/j.joi.2008.11.001

N/A

5.1DataRank · unranked

103 citations

Werner Marx, Hermann Schier, Erhard Rahm, Andreas Thor, Hans‐Dieter Daniel +1 more

The h index research output measurement: Two approaches to enhance its accuracy

Journal of Informetrics(2010)10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.005

N/A

4.8DataRank · unranked

81 citations

Rüdiger Mutz, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Heterogeneity of Inter-Rater Reliabilities of Grant Peer Reviews and Its Determinants: A General Estimating Equations Approach

PLoS ONE(2012)10.1371/journal.pone.0048509

N/A

4.6DataRank · unranked

81 citations

Lutz Bornmann, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Rüdiger Mutz

Convergent validation of peer review decisions using the h indexExtent of and reasons for type I and type II errors

Journal of Informetrics(2007)10.1016/j.joi.2007.01.002

N/A

3.8DataRank · unranked

65 citations

Lutz Bornmann, Hans‐Dieter Daniel

Does Gender Matter in Grant Peer Review?

Zeitschrift für Psychologie(2012)10.1027/2151-2604/a000103

N/A

3.6DataRank · unranked

75 citations

Lutz Bornmann, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Rüdiger Mutz

Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication

Scientometrics(2008)10.1007/s11192-007-1950-2

N/A

3.1DataRank · unranked

63 citations

Irina Nast, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

The manuscript reviewing process: Empirical research on review requests, review sequences, and decision rules in peer review

Library & Information Science Research(2010)10.1016/j.lisr.2009.07.010

N/A

2.9DataRank · unranked

54 citations

Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Multilevel‐statistical reformulation of citation‐based university rankings: The Leiden ranking 2011/2012

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology(2013)10.1002/asi.22857

N/A

2.6DataRank · unranked

69 citations

Rüdiger Mutz, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

A Multilevel Modelling Approach to Investigating the Predictive Validity of Editorial Decisions: Do the Editors of a High Profile Journal Select Manuscripts that are Highly Cited After Publication?

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society(2011)10.1111/j.1467-985x.2011.00689.x

N/A

2.5DataRank · unranked

89 citations

Rüdiger Mutz, Werner Marx, Hermann Schier, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

The luck of the referee draw: the effect of exchanging reviews

Learned Publishing(2009)10.1087/2009207

N/A

2.2DataRank · unranked

53 citations

Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Extent of type I and type II errors in editorial decisions: A case study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Journal of Informetrics(2009)10.1016/j.joi.2009.05.002

N/A

2.1DataRank · unranked

32 citations

Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Gatekeepers of science—Effects of external reviewers’ attributes on the assessments of fellowship applications

Journal of Informetrics(2007)10.1016/j.joi.2006.09.005

N/A

2.0DataRank · unranked

44 citations

Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Types of research output profiles: A multilevel latent class analysis of the Austrian Science Fund's final project report data

Research Evaluation(2012)10.1093/reseval/rvs038

N/A

1.5DataRank · unranked

20 citations

Rüdiger Mutz, Lutz Bornmann, Hans‐Dieter Daniel

Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? A study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology(2010)10.1002/asi.21418

N/A

1.4DataRank · unranked

38 citations

Hermann Schier, Werner Marx, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Are there really two types of h index variants? A validation study by using molecular life sciences data

Research Evaluation(2009)10.3152/095820209x466883

N/A

1.3DataRank · unranked

29 citations

Rüdiger Mutz, Gerlind Wallon, Anna Ledin, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Testing for the fairness and predictive validity of research funding decisions: A multilevel multiple imputation for missing data approach using ex‐ante and ex‐post peer evaluation data from the Austrian science fund

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology(2014)10.1002/asi.23315

N/A

1.2DataRank · unranked

21 citations

Lutz Bornmann, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Rüdiger Mutz

Cross-disciplinary research: What configurations of fields of science are found in grant proposals today?

Research Evaluation(2014)10.1093/reseval/rvu023

N/A

1.2DataRank · unranked

21 citations

Rüdiger Mutz, Lutz Bornmann, Hans‐Dieter Daniel

The effect of a two-stage publication process on the Journal Impact Factor: a case study on the interactive open access journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Scientometrics(2010)10.1007/s11192-010-0250-4

N/A

1.1DataRank · unranked

19 citations

Christoph Neuhaus, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

From black box to white box at open access journals: predictive validity of manuscript reviewing and editorial decisions at Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Research Evaluation(2010)10.3152/095820210x510089

N/A

1.1DataRank · unranked

28 citations

Werner Marx, Hermann Schier, Andreas Thor, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior

Journal of Documentation(2008)10.1108/00220410810844150

N/A

1.1DataRank · unranked

1503 citations

Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Latent Markov modeling applied to grant peer review

Journal of Informetrics(2008)10.1016/j.joi.2008.05.003

N/A

1.1DataRank · unranked

18 citations

Rüdiger Mutz, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

What do we know about the h index?

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology(2007)10.1002/asi.20609

N/A

0.973DataRank · unranked

654 citations

Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology(2008)10.1002/asi.20806

N/A

0.915DataRank · unranked

446 citations

Rüdiger Mutz, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?

Scientometrics(2005)10.1007/s11192-005-0281-4

N/A

0.899DataRank · unranked

400 citations

Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

The state of h index research

EMBO reports(2008)10.1038/embor.2008.233

N/A

0.898DataRank · unranked

396 citations

Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis

Journal of Informetrics(2007)10.1016/j.joi.2007.03.001

N/A

0.876DataRank · unranked

343 citations

Rüdiger Mutz, Lutz Bornmann, Ruediger Mutz, Hans‐Dieter Daniel

A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants

Journal of Informetrics(2011)10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.006

N/A

0.852DataRank · unranked

291 citations

Rüdiger Mutz, Sven E. Hug, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality?

Journal of Informetrics(2012)10.1016/j.joi.2011.08.004

N/A

0.826DataRank · unranked

246 citations

Hermann Schier, Werner Marx, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Do we need the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures?

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology(2009)10.1002/asi.21016

N/A

0.730DataRank · unranked

31 citations

Rüdiger Mutz, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Committee peer review at an international research foundation: predictive validity and fairness of selection decisions on post-graduate fellowship applications

Research Evaluation(2005)10.3152/147154405781776283

N/A

0.725DataRank · unranked

21 citations

Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Seasonal bias in editorial decisions? A study using data from chemistry

Learned Publishing(2011)10.1087/20110410

N/A

0.664DataRank · unranked

5 citations

Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Multiple publication on a single research study: Does it pay? The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology(2007)10.1002/asi.20531

N/A

0.628DataRank · unranked

65 citations

Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

The Effectiveness of the Peer Review Process: Inter‐Referee Agreement and Predictive Validity of Manuscript Refereeing at Angewandte Chemie

Angewandte Chemie International Edition(2008)10.1002/anie.200800513

N/A

0.581DataRank · unranked

47 citations

Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Reviewer and editor biases in journal peer review: an investigation of manuscript refereeing at Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Research Evaluation(2009)10.3152/095820209x477520

N/A

0.550DataRank · unranked

38 citations

Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

The Usefulness of Peer Review for Selecting Manuscripts for Publication: A Utility Analysis Taking as an Example a High-Impact Journal

PLoS ONE(2010)10.1371/journal.pone.0011344

N/A

0.524DataRank · unranked

32 citations

Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

A content analysis of referees’ comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ?

Scientometrics(2009)10.1007/s11192-009-0011-4

N/A

0.520DataRank · unranked

31 citations

Christophe Weymuth, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Are there any frontiers of research performance? Efficiency measurement of funded research projects with the Bayesian stochastic frontier analysis for count data

Journal of Informetrics(2017)10.1016/j.joi.2017.04.009

N/A

0.510DataRank · unranked

29 citations

Lutz Bornmann, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Rüdiger Mutz

Row-column (RC) association model applied to grant peer review

Scientometrics(2007)10.1007/s11192-006-1797-y

N/A

0.509DataRank · unranked

9 citations

Ruediger Mutz, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Citation speed as a measure to predict the attention an article receives: An investigation of the validity of editorial decisions at Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Journal of Informetrics(2010)10.1016/j.joi.2009.09.001

N/A

0.505DataRank · unranked

28 citations

Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

The citation speed index: A useful bibliometric indicator to add to the h index

Journal of Informetrics(2010)10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.007

N/A

0.505DataRank · unranked

28 citations

Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Do Author-Suggested Reviewers Rate Submissions More Favorably than Editor-Suggested Reviewers? A Study on Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

PLoS ONE(2010)10.1371/journal.pone.0013345

N/A

0.505DataRank · unranked

28 citations

Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Criteria Used by a Peer Review Committee for Selection of Research Fellows. A Boolean Probit Analysis

International Journal of Selection and Assessment(2005)10.1111/j.1468-2389.2005.00326.x

N/A

0.478DataRank · unranked

17 citations

Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

How Long is the Peer Review Process for Journal Manuscripts? A Case Study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition

CHIMIA(2010)10.2533/chimia.2010.72

N/A

0.470DataRank · unranked

22 citations

Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

How to detect indications of potential sources of bias in peer review: A generalized latent variable modeling approach exemplified by a gender study

Journal of Informetrics(2008)10.1016/j.joi.2008.09.003

N/A

0.425DataRank · unranked

16 citations

Rüdiger Mutz, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Funding decision-making systems: An empirical comparison of continuous and dichotomous approaches based on psychometric theory

Research Evaluation(2016)10.1093/reseval/rvw002

N/A

0.359DataRank · unranked

5 citations

Lutz Bornmann, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Rüdiger Mutz

Count regression models in informetrics

Journal of Informetrics(2016)10.1016/j.joi.2015.10.003

N/A

0.230DataRank · unranked

3 citations

Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Scientific publishing without gatekeeping: an empirical investigation of eLife’s new peer review process

Scientometrics(2025)10.1007/s11192-025-05422-y

N/A

0.224DataRank · unranked

3 citations

Lutz Bornmann, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Rüdiger Mutz

Latent Markov modelling applied to grant peer review

arXiv (Cornell University)(2006)10.48550/arxiv.math/0604039

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

0 citations

Ruediger Mutz, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Vorschau: Angew. Chem. 38/2008

Angewandte Chemie(2008)10.1002/ange.200890238

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

0 citations

Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Roald Hoffmann, Paul Schleyer, Henry F. Schaefer, Molekülen -Mehr Realismus +1 more

New approaches for increasing the reliability of the h index research performance measurement

arXiv (Cornell University)(2009)10.48550/arxiv.0908.3962

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

0 citations

Ruediger Mutz, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis

arXiv (Cornell University)(2007)10.48550/arxiv.math/0701537

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

0 citations

Ruediger Mutz, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann