Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants
Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants is a research paper published in Scientometrics (2006). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 5.9. It has been cited 119 times, with 104 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 49/100.
›Data sources & pipeline
FAIR Checklist
Context only (not used in score)- Has DOI
- Open Access
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
DataRank Breakdown
Base Score Contribution
0.718
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
5.2
From 88 citing papers with measurable signal
Top 5 citers driving the network score
Ranked by citation count — the same ordering the engine uses when summing log1p(Cq) over citers.
- What do we know about the <i>h</i> index?Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2007654 citationsDataRank 0.973
- Scientific peer reviewAnnual Review of Information Science and Technology2011559 citationsDataRank 0.949
- Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the <b><i>h</i></b> index? A comparison of nine different variants of the <b><i>h</i></b> index using data from biomedicineJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2008446 citationsDataRank 0.915
- What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality?Journal of Informetrics2012246 citationsDataRank 0.826
Why this DataRank?
DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 12% comes from its base citations and 88% from the citation network (88 citing papers contributed measurable signal).
- Base score B(p)
- log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
- Network N(p)
- Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
- Damping factor d = 0.85
- DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
- Self-citations excluded
- Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.
Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.
Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.