Don van Ravenzwaaij

Decision SciencesMathematicsPsychology

Pilot corpus only

This score is computed over theSindex pilot corpus and does not cover the full scientific literature. Scores are relative to papers we have ingested — papers, authors, and institutions outside the pilot are not represented. Methodology.

Top 100%percentile

0Author DataRank

Indexed papers

0in pilot corpus

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Papers

Driven by 11 papers. Top paper: “Do Researchers Anchor Their Beliefs on the Outcome of an Initial Study?”.

Do Researchers Anchor Their Beliefs on the Outcome of an Initial Study?

Experimental Psychology(2018)10.1027/1618-3169/a000402

N/A

0.951DataRank · unranked

10 citations

Rink Hoekstra, Andrew Gelman, Don van Ravenzwaaij, Anja F. Ernst, Eric‐Jan Wagenmakers +1 more

True and false positive rates for different criteria of evaluating statistical evidence from clinical trials

BMC Medical Research Methodology(2019)10.1186/s12874-019-0865-y

N/A

0.449DataRank · unranked

19 citations

John P. A. Ioannidis, Don van Ravenzwaaij

A simulation study of the strength of evidence in the recommendation of medications based on two trials with statistically significant results

PLOS ONE(2017)10.1371/journal.pone.0173184

N/A

0.442DataRank · unranked

18 citations

John P. A. Ioannidis, Don van Ravenzwaaij

Subjective evidence evaluation survey for many-analysts studies

Royal Society Open Science(2024)10.1098/rsos.240125

N/A

0.241DataRank · unranked

4 citations

Suzanne Hoogeveen, Don van den Bergh, Balazs Aczel, Casper J. Albers, Tim Althoff +37 more

True and False Positive Rates for Different Criteria of Evaluating Statistical Evidence from Clinical Trials

MetArXiv (OSF Preprints)(2018)10.31222/osf.io/kcz3y

N/A

0.165DataRank · unranked

2 citations

John P. A. Ioannidis, Don van Ravenzwaaij

True and False Positive Rates for Different Criteria of Evaluating Statistical Evidence from Clinical Trials

Research Square(2019)10.21203/rs.2.14574/v1

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

0 citations

John P. A. Ioannidis, Don van Ravenzwaaij

Author response for "Subjective evidence evaluation survey for many-analysts studies"

(2024)10.1098/rsos.240125/v3/response1

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

0 citations

Suzanne Hoogeveen, Don van den Bergh, Balazs Aczel, Casper J. Albers, Tim Althoff +38 more

Author response for "Subjective evidence evaluation survey for many-analysts studies"

(2024)10.1098/rsos.240125/v2/response1

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

0 citations

Suzanne Hoogeveen, Don van den Bergh, Balazs Aczel, Casper J. Albers, Tim Althoff +38 more

True and False Positive Rates for Different Criteria of Evaluating Statistical Evidence from Clinical Trials

Research Square(2019)10.21203/rs.2.14574/v2

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

0 citations

John P. A. Ioannidis, Don van Ravenzwaaij

An Expert Guide to Planning Experimental Tasks For Evidence-Accumulation Modeling

Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science(2025)10.1177/25152459251336127

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

7 citations

Reilly James Innes, Niek Stevenson, Giwon Bahg, Jerome R. Busemeyer, Gregory E. Cox +33 more

How can we make sound replication decisions?

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(2025)10.1073/pnas.2401236121

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

8 citations

Alexandra Sarafoglou, Balazs Aczel, Suyog Chandramouli, Timothy M. Errington, Sarahanne Field +13 more