Andrea H. Stoevenbelt

Decision SciencesSocial SciencesPsychology

Pilot corpus only

This score is computed over theSindex pilot corpus and does not cover the full scientific literature. Scores are relative to papers we have ingested — papers, authors, and institutions outside the pilot are not represented. Methodology.

Top 100%percentile

0Author DataRank

Indexed papers

0in pilot corpus

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Papers

Driven by 3 papers. Top paper: “Subjective evidence evaluation survey for many-analysts studies”.

Subjective evidence evaluation survey for many-analysts studies

Royal Society Open Science(2024)10.1098/rsos.240125

N/A

0.241DataRank · unranked

4 citations

Suzanne Hoogeveen, Don van den Bergh, Balazs Aczel, Casper J. Albers, Tim Althoff +37 more

Author response for "Subjective evidence evaluation survey for many-analysts studies"

(2024)10.1098/rsos.240125/v3/response1

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

0 citations

Suzanne Hoogeveen, Don van den Bergh, Balazs Aczel, Casper J. Albers, Tim Althoff +38 more

Author response for "Subjective evidence evaluation survey for many-analysts studies"

(2024)10.1098/rsos.240125/v2/response1

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

0 citations

Suzanne Hoogeveen, Don van den Bergh, Balazs Aczel, Casper J. Albers, Tim Althoff +38 more