Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

What do citation counts measure? An updated review of studies on citations in scientific documents published between 2006 and 2018

Scientometrics(2019)10.1007/s11192-019-03243-4Source: DataRank Database

What do citation counts measure? An updated review of studies on citations in scientific documents published between 2006 and 2018 is a research paper published in Scientometrics (2019). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.1. It has been cited 161 times, with 17 citing works in its 1-hop citation network.

N/A

1.1DataRank · unranked

Scored on demand from live citation data

Open Access161 citations · 17 citing works in its network

Download PDF

Cite:

Linked data & code

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:Impact (FWCI 1.61)OA: greenTopics (13)Linked Datasets (2)DataCite Reuse (2)IDs (PubMed, OpenAlex)SDGs (1)

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (2/2)

Has DOI
Indexed in repositories

Accessible (1/2)

Open Access

Interoperable (2/2)

DataCite relations
Linked datasets

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

DataRank Breakdown

Base Score 67%Citation Network 33%

Base Score Contribution

0.763

From this paper's citation signal

Citation Network Contribution

0.382

From 12 citing papers with measurable signal

Learn more about DataRank methodology →

Authors (2)

Lutz Bornmann ORCID,Iman Tahamtan ORCID

Live enrichment

PubMed:30945415 OpenAlex:https://openalex.org/W2953364155

FWCI

1.61

Citation Percentile

0.9%

Citation Trend

2019

2020

2021

2023

2025

greenLicense: http://www.springer.com/tdm

repositoryhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.04588

publisherhttp://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11192-019-03243-4.pdf

publisherhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-019-03243-4/fulltext.html

repositoryhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1906.04588

Fields of Study

scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAdvanced Text Analysis TechniquesBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

Keywords

CitationContext (archaeology)Computer scienceData scienceInformation retrievalScientific literatureNarrative reviewLibrary sciencePsychologyHistory

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG 0: Quality Education

Additional file 1 of Making decisions for effective humanitarian actions: a conceptual framework for relief distribution

10.6084/m9.figshare.22602344.v1figshare

Additional file 1 of Making decisions for effective humanitarian actions: a conceptual framework for relief distribution

10.6084/m9.figshare.22602344figshare

Related Papers (10)

What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior

N/A

1.1DataRank · unranked

Journal of Documentation(2008)

co-cited

10.1108/00220410810844150

Characterizing in-text citations in scientific articles: A large-scale analysis

N/A

4.8DataRank · unranked

Journal of Informetrics(2018)

co-cited

10.1016/j.joi.2017.11.005

Citation concept analysis (CCA): a new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper

N/A

0.604DataRank · unranked

Scientometrics(2019)

co-citedsame journal

10.1007/s11192-019-03326-2

An evaluation of percentile measures of citation impact, and a proposal for making them better

N/A

0.538DataRank · unranked

Scientometrics(2020)

co-citedsame journal

10.1007/s11192-020-03512-7

Normalisation of citation impact in economics

N/A

1.7DataRank · unranked

Scientometrics(2019)

co-citedsame journal

10.1007/s11192-019-03140-w

Scientific peer review

N/A

0.949DataRank · unranked

Annual Review of Information Science and Technology(2011)

co-cited

10.1002/aris.2011.1440450112

A Large-Scale Analysis of Impact Factor Biased Journal Self-Citations

N/A

5.1DataRank · unranked

PLOS ONE(2016)

co-cited

10.1371/journal.pone.0161021

A simple proposal for the publication of journal citation distributions

N/A

15.4DataRank · unranked

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)(2016)

co-cited

10.1101/062109

Citation concept analysis (CCA) of Robert K. Merton’s book Social Theory and Social Structure: How often are certain concepts from the book cited in subsequent publications?

N/A

0.569DataRank · unranked

Quantitative Science Studies(2020)

co-cited

10.1162/qss_a_00029

The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects

N/A

2.6DataRank · unranked

Springer Handbooks(2019)

co-cited

10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_1