Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

Citation concept analysis (CCA): a new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper

Scientometrics(2019)10.1007/s11192-019-03326-2Source: DataRank Database

Citation concept analysis (CCA): a new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper is a research paper published in Scientometrics (2019). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.604. It has been cited 55 times.

N/A

0.604DataRank · unranked

Scored on demand from live citation data

Open Access55 citations

Download PDF

Cite:

Linked data & code

Citation concept analysis (CCA) - A new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by two exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper · arXiv

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:Funding (1 grants)Impact (FWCI 4.73)OA: hybridTopics (10)Linked Datasets (1)DataCite Reuse (1)IDs (PubMed, OpenAlex)

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (2/2)

Has DOI
Indexed in repositories

Accessible (1/2)

Open Access

Interoperable (2/2)

DataCite relations
Linked datasets

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

DataRank Breakdown

Base Score 100%Citation Network 0%

Base Score Contribution

0.604

From this paper's citation signal

Citation Network Contribution

Citation network not refreshed for this result

This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.

Learn more about DataRank methodology →

Authors (3)

K. Brad Wray ORCID,Robin Haunschild ORCID,Lutz Bornmann ORCID

Live enrichment

PubMed:20819859 OpenAlex:https://openalex.org/W2995961839

Aarhus Universitets Forskningsfond

Grant: AUFF-E-2017-FLS-7-3

FWCI

4.73

Citation Percentile

1.0%

Citation Trend

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

hybridLicense: cc-by

journalhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11192-019-03326-2.pdf

publisherhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11192-019-03326-2.pdf

publisherhttp://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11192-019-03326-2.pdf

publisherhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-019-03326-2/fulltext.html

journalhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03326-2

Fields of Study

scientometrics and bibliometrics researchBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

Keywords

Citation analysisCitationComputer scienceSociologyEpistemologyData scienceLibrary sciencePhilosophy

Citation concept analysis (CCA) - A new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by two exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper

10.48550/arxiv.1905.12410arXiv