Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

The history of the golgi apparatus in neurones from its discovery in 1898 to electron microscopy

Brain Research Bulletin(1998)10.1016/s0361-9230(98)00080-xSource: DataRank Database

The history of the golgi apparatus in neurones from its discovery in 1898 to electron microscopy is a research paper published in Brain Research Bulletin (1998). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.428. It has been cited 6 times, with 4 citing works in its 1-hop citation network.

N/A

0.428DataRank · unranked

0.428

6 citations · base score 1.9

Cite:

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

›Data sources & pipeline

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (1/2)

Has DOI

Accessible (0/2)

Interoperable (0/2)

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

DataRank Breakdown

Base Score 68%Citation Network 32%

Base Score Contribution

0.292

From this paper's citation signal

Citation Network Contribution

0.136

From 3 citing papers with measurable signal

Learn more about DataRank methodology →

Top 1 citer driving the network score

Ranked by citation count — the same ordering the engine uses when summing log1p(C_q) over citers.

Facts versus artefacts in cytology: The Golgi apparatus
Experimental Cell Research195158 citationsDataRank 4.4

Why this DataRank?

DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 68% comes from its base citations and 32% from the citation network (3 citing papers contributed measurable signal).

Base score B(p): log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
Network N(p): Σ over citers of log1p(C_q) ÷ max(outdegree_q, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
Damping factor d = 0.85: DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
Self-citations excluded: Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

Read the full methodology →

Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.

Node colors:CenterData PaperData + Open AccessNon-dataSelected & links| Node size = percentile rank