Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

In Vivo Termini Amino Acid Labeling for Quantitative Proteomics

Analytical Chemistry(2011)10.1021/ac201035fSource: DataRank Database

In Vivo Termini Amino Acid Labeling for Quantitative Proteomics is a research paper published in Analytical Chemistry (2011). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.4. It has been cited 26 times, with 20 citing works in its 1-hop citation network.

N/A

1.4DataRank · unranked

1.4

26 citations · base score 3.3

Cite:

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

›Data sources & pipeline

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (1/2)

Has DOI

Accessible (0/2)

Interoperable (0/2)

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

DataRank Breakdown

Base Score 36%Citation Network 64%

Base Score Contribution

0.494

From this paper's citation signal

Citation Network Contribution

0.865

From 18 citing papers with measurable signal

Learn more about DataRank methodology →

Top 3 citers driving the network score

Ranked by citation count — the same ordering the engine uses when summing log1p(C_q) over citers.

High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins.
Journal of Biological Chemistry197519,358 citationsDataRank 1.5
Relative Protein Quantification by Isobaric SILAC with Immonium Ion Splitting (ISIS)
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics200831 citationsDataRank 1.6
Comparison of LFQ and IPTL for Protein Identification and Relative Quantification
Molecules20213 citationsDataRank 0.234

Why this DataRank?

DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 36% comes from its base citations and 64% from the citation network (18 citing papers contributed measurable signal).

Base score B(p): log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
Network N(p): Σ over citers of log1p(C_q) ÷ max(outdegree_q, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
Damping factor d = 0.85: DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
Self-citations excluded: Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

Read the full methodology →

Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.

Node colors:CenterData PaperData + Open AccessNon-dataSelected & links| Node size = percentile rank