Exploring Extended Warheads toward Developing Cysteine-Targeted Covalent Kinase Inhibitors is a research paper published in Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (2024). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.165. It has been cited 2 times.
In designing covalent kinase inhibitors (CKIs), the inclusion of electrophiles as attacking warheads demands careful choreography, ensuring not only their presence on the scaffold moiety but also their precise interaction with nucleophiles in the binding sites. Given the limited number of known electrophiles, exploring adjacent chemical space to broaden the palette of available electrophiles capable of covalent inhibition is desirable. Here, we systematically analyze the characteristics of warheads and the corresponding adjacent fragments for use in CKI design. We first collect all the released cysteine-targeted CKIs from multiple databases and create one CKI data set containing 16,961 kinase-inhibitor data points from 12,381 unique CKIs covering 146 kinases with accessible cysteines in their binding pockets. Then, we analyze this data set, focusing on the extended warheads (i.e., warheads + adjacent fragments)─including 30 common warheads and 1344 unique adjacent fragments. In so doing, we provide structural insights and delineate chemical properties and patterns in these extended warheads. Notably, we highlight the popular patterns observed within reversible CKIs for the popular warheads cyanoacrylamide and aldehyde. This study provides medicinal chemists with novel insights into extended warheads and a comprehensive source of adjacent fragments, thus guiding the design, synthesis, and optimization of CKIs.
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Base Score Contribution
0.165
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
Citation network not refreshed for this result
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 100% comes from its base citations and 0% from the citation network.
Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.