🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog

Nature(2005)10.1038/nature04338Source: DataRank Database

Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog is a dataset published in Nature (2005). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 11.6, placing it in the top 18.1% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 2,623 times, with 135 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 28/100.

Top 18%percentile
11.6DataRank
11.6Top 18%
Dataset Open Access2623 citations · base score 7.9
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

Here we report a high-quality draft genome sequence of the domestic dog (Canis familiaris), together with a dense map of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across breeds. The dog is of particular interest because it provides important evolutionary information and because existing breeds show great phenotypic diversity for morphological, physiological and behavioural traits. We use sequence comparison with the primate and rodent lineages to shed light on the structure and evolution of genomes and genes. Notably, the majority of the most highly conserved non-coding sequences in mammalian genomes are clustered near a small subset of genes with important roles in development. Analysis of SNPs reveals long-range haplotypes across the entire dog genome, and defines the nature of genetic diversity within and across breeds. The current SNP map now makes it possible for genome-wide association studies to identify genes responsible for diseases and traits, with important consequences for human and companion animal health.

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (1/2)
  • Open Access
Interoperable (0/2)
    Reusable (1/3)
    • Dataset classification

    FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

    28FAIR score
    F Findable
    20
    A Accessible
    43
    I Interoperable
    25
    R Reusable
    25
    Top 90% by FAIRLLM-assessed✓ full text read

    Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →

    DataRank Breakdown

    Base Score 10%Citation Network 90%

    Base Score Contribution

    1.2

    From this paper's citation signal

    Citation Network Contribution

    10.4

    From 135 citing papers with measurable signal

    Learn more about DataRank methodology →

    Top 5 citers driving the network score

    Ranked by citation count — the same ordering the engine uses when summing log1p(Cq) over citers.

    1. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles
      Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences200555,906 citationsDataRank 1.6
    2. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome
      Nature200124,542 citationsDataRank 17.1Top 10%
    3. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps
      Bioinformatics200414,680 citationsDataRank 1.4
    4. The Sequence of the Human Genome
      Science200113,648 citationsDataRank 18.7Top 7%
    Why this DataRank?

    DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 10% comes from its base citations and 90% from the citation network (135 citing papers contributed measurable signal).

    Base score B(p)
    log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
    Network N(p)
    Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
    Damping factor d = 0.85
    DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
    Self-citations excluded
    Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

    Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

    Read the full methodology →

    Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.

    Node colors:CenterData PaperData + Open AccessNon-dataSelected & links| Node size = percentile rank

    Authors (51)

    Related Papers (10)