🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans

Nature(2020)10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7Source: DataRank Database

The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans is a research paper published in Nature (2020). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.4. It has been cited 9,958 times. Its calibrated FAIR score is 80/100.

N/A
1.4DataRank · unranked
1.4
Open Access9958 citations · base score 9.2
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

Genetic variants that inactivate protein-coding genes are a powerful source of information about the phenotypic consequences of gene disruption: genes that are crucial for the function of an organism will be depleted of such variants in natural populations, whereas non-essential genes will tolerate their accumulation. However, predicted loss-of-function variants are enriched for annotation errors, and tend to be found at extremely low frequencies, so their analysis requires careful variant annotation and very large sample sizes1. Here we describe the aggregation of 125,748 exomes and 15,708 genomes from human sequencing studies into the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). We identify 443,769 high-confidence predicted loss-of-function variants in this cohort after filtering for artefacts caused by sequencing and annotation errors. Using an improved model of human mutation rates, we classify human protein-coding genes along a spectrum that represents tolerance to inactivation, validate this classification using data from model organisms and engineered human cells, and show that it can be used to improve the power of gene discovery for both common and rare diseases.

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (1/2)
  • Open Access
Interoperable (0/2)
    Reusable (0/3)

      FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

      80FAIR score
      F Findable
      100
      A Accessible
      70
      I Interoperable
      100
      R Reusable
      50
      Top 1% by FAIRdeterministic✓ full text read

      Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →

      DataRank Breakdown

      Base Score 100%Citation Network 0%

      Base Score Contribution

      1.4

      From this paper's citation signal

      Citation Network Contribution

      0

      Citation network not refreshed for this result

      This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.

      Learn more about DataRank methodology →
      Why this DataRank?

      DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 100% comes from its base citations and 0% from the citation network.

      Base score B(p)
      log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
      Network N(p)
      Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
      Damping factor d = 0.85
      DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
      Self-citations excluded
      Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

      Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

      Read the full methodology →

      Authors (192)

      Related Papers (10)

      Nature(2015)
      co-citedsame journal
      10.1038/nature15393
      The American Journal of Human Genetics(2007)
      co-cited
      10.1086/519795
      Bioinformatics(2013)
      co-cited
      10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635
      Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools
      N/A
      1.4DataRank · unranked
      GigaScience(2021)
      co-cited
      10.1093/gigascience/giab008