🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog of published genome-wide association studies, targeted arrays and summary statistics 2019

Nucleic Acids Research(2018)10.1093/nar/gky1120Source: DataRank Database

The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog of published genome-wide association studies, targeted arrays and summary statistics 2019 is a dataset published in Nucleic Acids Research (2018). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 14.4, placing it in the top 13.9% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 4,574 times, with 188 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 84/100.

Top 14%percentile
14.4DataRank
14.4Top 14%
Dataset Open Access4574 citations · base score 8.4
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

The GWAS Catalog delivers a high-quality curated collection of all published genome-wide association studies enabling investigations to identify causal variants, understand disease mechanisms, and establish targets for novel therapies. The scope of the Catalog has also expanded to targeted and exome arrays with 1000 new associations added for these technologies. As of September 2018, the Catalog contains 5687 GWAS comprising 71673 variant-trait associations from 3567 publications. New content includes 284 full P-value summary statistics datasets for genome-wide and new targeted array studies, representing 6 × 109 individual variant-trait statistics. In the last 12 months, the Catalog's user interface was accessed by ∼90000 unique users who viewed >1 million pages. We have improved data access with the release of a new RESTful API to support high-throughput programmatic access, an improved web interface and a new summary statistics database. Summary statistics provision is supported by a new format proposed as a community standard for summary statistics data representation. This format was derived from our experience in standardizing heterogeneous submissions, mapping formats and in harmonizing content. Availability: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/.

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (2/2)
  • Has DOI
  • Indexed in repositories
Accessible (1/2)
  • Open Access
Interoperable (2/2)
  • DataCite relations
  • Linked datasets
Reusable (1/3)
  • Dataset classification

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

84FAIR score
F Findable
100
A Accessible
70
I Interoperable
100
R Reusable
67
Top 0% by FAIRdeterministic✓ full text read

Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →

DataRank Breakdown

Base Score 9%Citation Network 91%

Base Score Contribution

1.3

From this paper's citation signal

Citation Network Contribution

13.2

From 188 citing papers with measurable signal

Learn more about DataRank methodology →

Top 5 citers driving the network score

Ranked by citation count — the same ordering the engine uses when summing log1p(Cq) over citers.

  1. PLINK: A Tool Set for Whole-Genome Association and Population-Based Linkage Analyses
    The American Journal of Human Genetics200735,753 citationsDataRank 1.6
  2. A global reference for human genetic variation
    Nature201519,823 citationsDataRank 11.1Top 19%
Why this DataRank?

DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 9% comes from its base citations and 91% from the citation network (188 citing papers contributed measurable signal).

Base score B(p)
log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
Network N(p)
Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
Damping factor d = 0.85
DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
Self-citations excluded
Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

Read the full methodology →

Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.

Node colors:CenterData PaperData + Open AccessNon-dataSelected & links| Node size = percentile rank

Authors (29)