🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

An integrated transcriptomic cell atlas of human endoderm-derived organoids

Nature Genetics(2025)10.1038/s41588-025-02182-6Source: DataRank Database

An integrated transcriptomic cell atlas of human endoderm-derived organoids is a dataset published in Nature Genetics (2025). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.478, placing it in the top 48.7% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 25 times, with 22 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 60/100.

Top 49%percentile
0.478DataRank
0.478Top 49%
Dataset Open Access25 citations · base score 2.6
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

Human pluripotent stem cells and tissue-resident fetal and adult stem cells can generate epithelial tissues of endodermal origin in vitro that recapitulate aspects of developing and adult human physiology. Here, we integrate single-cell transcriptomes from 218 samples covering organoids and other models of diverse endoderm-derived tissues to establish an initial version of a human endoderm-derived organoid cell atlas. The integration includes nearly one million cells across diverse conditions, data sources and protocols. We compare cell types and states between organoid models and harmonize cell annotations through mapping to primary tissue counterparts. Focusing on the intestine and lung, we provide examples of mapping data from new protocols and show how the atlas can be used as a diverse cohort to assess perturbations and disease models. The human endoderm-derived organoid cell atlas makes diverse datasets centrally available and will be valuable to assess fidelity, characterize perturbed and diseased states, and streamline protocol development.

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (1/2)
  • Open Access
Interoperable (0/2)
    Reusable (1/3)
    • Dataset classification

    FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

    60FAIR score
    F Findable
    78
    A Accessible
    80
    I Interoperable
    25
    R Reusable
    58
    Top 7% by FAIRLLM-assessed✓ full text read

    Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →

    DataRank Breakdown

    Base Score 83%Citation Network 17%

    Base Score Contribution

    0.396

    From this paper's citation signal

    Citation Network Contribution

    0.0823

    From 8 citing papers with measurable signal

    Learn more about DataRank methodology →

    Top 5 citers driving the network score

    Ranked by citation count — the same ordering the engine uses when summing log1p(Cq) over citers.

    Why this DataRank?

    DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 83% comes from its base citations and 17% from the citation network (8 citing papers contributed measurable signal).

    Base score B(p)
    log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
    Network N(p)
    Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
    Damping factor d = 0.85
    DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
    Self-citations excluded
    Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

    Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

    Read the full methodology →

    Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.

    Node colors:CenterData PaperData + Open AccessNon-dataSelected & links| Node size = percentile rank

    Authors (34)

    Related Papers (10)

    Nature Methods(2019)
    co-cited
    10.1038/s41592-019-0494-8