Performance of Gut Microbiome as an Independent Diagnostic Tool for 20 Diseases: Cross-Cohort Validation of Machine-Learning Classifiers is a research paper published in Gut Microbes (2023). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.557. It has been cited 40 times.
Cross-cohort validation is essential for gut-microbiome-based disease stratification but was only performed for limited diseases. Here, we systematically evaluated the cross-cohort performance of gut microbiome-based machine-learning classifiers for 20 diseases. Using single-cohort classifiers, we obtained high predictive accuracies in intra-cohort validation (~0.77 AUC), but low accuracies in cross-cohort validation, except the intestinal diseases (~0.73 AUC). We then built combined-cohort classifiers trained on samples combined from multiple cohorts to improve the validation of non-intestinal diseases, and estimated the required sample size to achieve validation accuracies of >0.7. In addition, we observed higher validation performance for classifiers using metagenomic data than 16S amplicon data in intestinal diseases. We further quantified the cross-cohort marker consistency using a Marker Similarity Index and observed similar trends. Together, our results supported the gut microbiome as an independent diagnostic tool for intestinal diseases and revealed strategies to improve cross-cohort performance based on identified determinants of consistent cross-cohort gut microbiome alterations.
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Base Score Contribution
0.557
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
Citation network not refreshed for this result
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 100% comes from its base citations and 0% from the citation network.
Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.