🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

AMDB: a database of animal gut microbial communities with manually curated metadata

Nucleic Acids Research(2021)10.1093/nar/gkab1009Source: DataRank Database

AMDB: a database of animal gut microbial communities with manually curated metadata is a dataset published in Nucleic Acids Research (2021). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.2, placing it in the top 40.7% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 24 times, with 24 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 48/100.

Top 41%percentile
1.2DataRank
1.2Top 41%
Dataset Open Access24 citations · base score 3.1
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

Variations in gut microbiota can be explained by animal host characteristics, including host phylogeny and diet. However, there are currently no databases that allow for easy exploration of the relationship between gut microbiota and diverse animal hosts. The Animal Microbiome Database (AMDB) is the first database to provide taxonomic profiles of the gut microbiota in various animal species. AMDB contains 2530 amplicon data from 34 projects with manually curated metadata. The total data represent 467 animal species and contain 10 478 bacterial taxa. This novel database provides information regarding gut microbiota structures and the distribution of gut bacteria in animals, with an easy-to-use interface. Interactive visualizations are also available, enabling effective investigation of the relationship between the gut microbiota and animal hosts. AMDB will contribute to a better understanding of the gut microbiota of animals. AMDB is publicly available without login requirements at http://leb.snu.ac.kr/amdb.

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (1/2)
  • Open Access
Interoperable (0/2)
    Reusable (1/3)
    • Dataset classification

    FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

    48FAIR score
    F Findable
    65
    A Accessible
    68
    I Interoperable
    25
    R Reusable
    33
    Top 56% by FAIRLLM-assessed✓ full text read

    Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →

    DataRank Breakdown

    Base Score 40%Citation Network 60%

    Base Score Contribution

    0.464

    From this paper's citation signal

    Citation Network Contribution

    0.709

    From 20 citing papers with measurable signal

    Learn more about DataRank methodology →

    Top 5 citers driving the network score

    Ranked by citation count — the same ordering the engine uses when summing log1p(Cq) over citers.

    1. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics
      PeerJ201610,782 citationsDataRank 1.4
    2. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies
      International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology20177,690 citationsDataRank 14.4Top 14%
    3. Qiita: rapid, web-enabled microbiome meta-analysis
      Nature Methods2018697 citationsDataRank 0.982
    Why this DataRank?

    DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 40% comes from its base citations and 60% from the citation network (20 citing papers contributed measurable signal).

    Base score B(p)
    log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
    Network N(p)
    Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
    Damping factor d = 0.85
    DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
    Self-citations excluded
    Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

    Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

    Read the full methodology →

    Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.

    Node colors:CenterData PaperData + Open AccessNon-dataSelected & links| Node size = percentile rank