Multi‐scale analysis of the associations among egg, larval and pupal surveys and the presence and abundance of adult female <i>Aedes aegypti</i> ( <i>Stegomyia aegypti</i> ) in the city of Merida, Mexico is a research paper published in Medical and Veterinary Entomology (2014). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.0. It has been cited 33 times, with 13 citing works in its 1-hop citation network.
Abstract. Despite decades of research, there is still no agreement on which indices of Aedes aegypti ( Stegomyia aegypti ) (Diptera: Culicidae) presence and abundance better quantify entomological risk for dengue. This study reports the results of a multi‐scale, cross‐sectional entomological survey carried out in 1160 households in the city of Merida, Mexico to establish: (a) the correlation between levels of Ae. aegypti presence and abundance detected with aspirators and ovitraps; (b) which immature and egg indices correlate with the presence and abundance of Ae. aegypti females, and (c) the correlations amongst traditional Aedes indices and their modifications for pupae at the household level and within medium‐sized geographic areas used for vector surveillance. Our analyses show that ovitrap positivity was significantly associated with indoor adult Ae. aegypti presence [odds ratio (OR) = 1.50; P = 0.03], that the presence of pupae is associated with adult presence at the household level (OR = 2.27; P = 0.001), that classic Aedes indices are informative only when they account for pupae, and that window screens provide a significant level of protection against peridomestic Ae. aegypti (OR = 0.59; P = 0.02). Results reinforce the potential of using both positive collections in outdoor ovitraps and the presence of pupae as sensitive indicators of indoor adult female presence.
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Base Score Contribution
0.529
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.498
From 12 citing papers with measurable signal
DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 52% comes from its base citations and 48% from the citation network (12 citing papers contributed measurable signal).
Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.
Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.