Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics is a research paper published in Science (2016). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.1. It has been cited 1,375 times.
Scored on demand from live citation data
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.
Base Score Contribution
1.1
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
Citation network not refreshed for this result
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →Austrian Science Fund
Grant: Y617-G11
Austrian National Bank
Grant: OeNB 14953
Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius Foundation
Grant: P2015-0001:1
Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius Foundation
Grant: P2013-0156:1
Swedish Foundation for Humanities and Social Sciences
Grant: NHS14-1719:1
Sloan Foundation
Grant: G-2015-13929
Austrian Science Fund FWF
Grant: Y 617
Market Efficiency and Financial Market Regulations - An Experimental Approach
Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
Grant: unidentified
unidentified
Behavioral and Neuroeconomics Discovery Fund
Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
FWCI
78.91
Citation Percentile
1.0%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals
When Humans Become the Feedback Loop: A Scenario Atlas of Human Responses to Defensive and Reactive Misalignment
When Humans Become the Feedback Loop: A Scenario Atlas of Human Responses to Defensive and Reactive Misalignment
Additional file 1 of Semantic and cognitive tools to aid statistical science: replace confidence and significance by compatibility and surprise
Additional file 1 of Semantic and cognitive tools to aid statistical science: replace confidence and significance by compatibility and surprise
Additional file 2 of Semantic and cognitive tools to aid statistical science: replace confidence and significance by compatibility and surprise
Additional file 2 of Semantic and cognitive tools to aid statistical science: replace confidence and significance by compatibility and surprise
Additional file 3 of Semantic and cognitive tools to aid statistical science: replace confidence and significance by compatibility and surprise
Additional file 3 of Semantic and cognitive tools to aid statistical science: replace confidence and significance by compatibility and surprise
Additional file 4 of Semantic and cognitive tools to aid statistical science: replace confidence and significance by compatibility and surprise
Additional file 4 of Semantic and cognitive tools to aid statistical science: replace confidence and significance by compatibility and surprise
Additional file 2 of High-throughput analysis suggests differences in journal false discovery rate by subject area and impact factor but not open access status
Additional file 2 of High-throughput analysis suggests differences in journal false discovery rate by subject area and impact factor but not open access status
Additional file 1 of The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence
Additional file 1 of The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence
Additional file 10 of Evaluating implementation of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines: the TRUST process for rating journal policies, procedures, and practices
Additional file 10 of Evaluating implementation of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines: the TRUST process for rating journal policies, procedures, and practices
Additional file 1 of Evaluating implementation of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines: the TRUST process for rating journal policies, procedures, and practices
Additional file 1 of Evaluating implementation of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines: the TRUST process for rating journal policies, procedures, and practices
Additional file 2 of Evaluating implementation of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines: the TRUST process for rating journal policies, procedures, and practices
Additional file 2 of Evaluating implementation of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines: the TRUST process for rating journal policies, procedures, and practices