Comparison of aspects of smoking among the four histological types of lung cancer is a research paper published in Tobacco Control (2008). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.847. It has been cited 283 times.
BackgroundThe magnitude of the link between cigarette smoking and lung cancer may vary by histological type.MethodsWe used polytomous logistic regression to evaluate whether aspects of smoking have different effects across four histological types in the Nurses' Health Study.ResultsFrom 1976 to 2002, we identified 1062 cases of lung cancer: squamous cell (n = 201), small cell (n = 236), adenocarcinoma (n = 543) and large cell carcinoma (n = 82), among 65 560 current or former smokers. Risk reduction after quitting ranged from an 8% reduction (relative risk (RR): 0.92, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.94) to a 17% reduction (RR: 0.83, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.86) per year for adenocarcinoma and small cell carcinoma, respectively, with a 9% reduction observed for large cell carcinoma and an 11% reduction observed for squamous cell carcinoma. The association of age at smoking initiation and former cigarette smoking was similar across types, while the association of smoking duration differed. The risk of adenocarcinoma increased by 6% per year of smoking, compared to 7% for large cell, 10% for squamous cell and 12% for small cell. The 6% difference between adenocarcinoma and small cell carcinoma is equivalent to a 3.2 to 9.7-fold increase in risk for 20 years of smoking.ConclusionsThe effects of the number of cigarettes smoked per day and years since quitting smoking are different across the major types of lung cancer, which are fully appreciated at long durations of smoking and smoking cessation. Smoking prevention and cessation should continue to be the focus of public health efforts to reduce lung cancer incidence and mortality.
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Base Score Contribution
0.847
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
Citation network not refreshed for this result
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 100% comes from its base citations and 0% from the citation network.
Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.