🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

THE DISTRIBUTION AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF ULTRACENTRIFUGALLY SEPARATED LIPOPROTEINS IN HUMAN SERUM

Journal of Clinical Investigation(1955)10.1172/jci103182Source: DataRank Database

THE DISTRIBUTION AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF ULTRACENTRIFUGALLY SEPARATED LIPOPROTEINS IN HUMAN SERUM is a research paper published in Journal of Clinical Investigation (1955). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.4. It has been cited 8,802 times.

N/A
1.4DataRank · unranked
1.4
Open Access8802 citations · base score 9.1
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

In the past few years several methods have been developed for the analysis of serum lipoproteins.Lindgren, Elliott, and Gofman (1) have utilized the relatively low density of the lipoproteins to separate them from the other serum proteins by ultracentrifugal flotation.Quantitation was sub- sequently performed by refractometric methods in the analytical ultracentrifuge.Separations of lipoproteins have also been made by Cohn frac- tionation in cold ethanol, and the quantities of lipoprotein have been estimated from the lipid.content of the fractions (2, 3).Widely used at the present time is the method of zone electrophoresis with quantitation either by staining (4) or by chemical analysis of eluates from the support- ing medium (5, 6).Each of these methods has serious limitations.Analytical ultracentrifugal techniques (7, 8) require the possession of expensive equipment.The quantitation of data is subject to considerable error and gives no information regarding the chemi- cal composition of the lipoproteins.Cohn frac- tionation requires facilities for operation at -5°C.It permits accurate determination of the lipid com- ponents of the alpha and beta lipoproteins, but with this technique it is impossible to subfractionate these groups.With certain abnormal sera the method is unreliable (9).Determination of electrophoretically separated fractions by stain- ing techniques or by chemical analysis of eluates is subject to appreciable error.Both Cohn frac- tionation and electrophoretic techniques fail to separate lipoproteins from other serum pro- teins, thus making impossible the study of the protein moiety.The combination of preparative ultracentrifu- gation with chemical analysis of the separated fractions would seem to be a procedure by which both the distribution and composition of lipo- proteins could be determined simply and accu- rately.

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (1/2)
  • Open Access
Interoperable (0/2)
    Reusable (0/3)

      FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

      DataRank Breakdown

      Base Score 100%Citation Network 0%

      Base Score Contribution

      1.4

      From this paper's citation signal

      Citation Network Contribution

      0

      Citation network not refreshed for this result

      This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.

      Learn more about DataRank methodology →
      Why this DataRank?

      DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 100% comes from its base citations and 0% from the citation network.

      Base score B(p)
      log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
      Network N(p)
      Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
      Damping factor d = 0.85
      DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
      Self-citations excluded
      Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

      Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

      Read the full methodology →

      Authors (3)

      Howard A. Eder,Joseph H. Bragdon,Richard J. Havel