🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

Machine learning and genome annotation: a match meant to be?

Genome Biology(2013)10.1186/gb-2013-14-5-205Source: DataRank Database

Machine learning and genome annotation: a match meant to be? is a research paper published in Genome Biology (2013). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 3.8. It has been cited 103 times, with 102 citing works in its 1-hop citation network.

N/A
3.8DataRank · unranked
3.8
Open Access103 citations · base score 4.6
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

By its very nature, genomics produces large, high-dimensional datasets that are well suited to analysis by machine learning approaches. Here, we explain some key aspects of machine learning that make it useful for genome annotation, with illustrative examples from ENCODE.

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (1/2)
  • Open Access
Interoperable (0/2)
    Reusable (0/3)

      FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

      DataRank Breakdown

      Base Score 18%Citation Network 82%

      Base Score Contribution

      0.697

      From this paper's citation signal

      Citation Network Contribution

      3.2

      From 86 citing papers with measurable signal

      Learn more about DataRank methodology →

      Top 5 citers driving the network score

      Ranked by citation count — the same ordering the engine uses when summing log1p(Cq) over citers.

      1. Random Forests
        Machine Learning2001121,133 citationsDataRank 1.8
      2. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome
        Nature200124,542 citationsDataRank 17.1Top 10%
      3. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome
        Nature201219,311 citationsDataRank 23.8Top 3%
      4. The Sequence of the Human Genome
        Science200113,648 citationsDataRank 18.7Top 7%
      Why this DataRank?

      DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 18% comes from its base citations and 82% from the citation network (86 citing papers contributed measurable signal).

      Base score B(p)
      log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
      Network N(p)
      Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
      Damping factor d = 0.85
      DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
      Self-citations excluded
      Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

      Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

      Read the full methodology →

      Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.

      Node colors:CenterData PaperData + Open AccessNon-dataSelected & links| Node size = percentile rank

      Related Papers (10)

      Nature Methods(2010)
      co-cited
      10.1038/nmeth0710-501
      Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(2010)
      co-cited
      10.1073/pnas.0909344107
      Journal of Computational Biology(2000)
      co-cited
      10.1089/106652700750050961
      Nature(2006)
      co-cited
      10.1038/nature04979