🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

Correction to: Citation concept analysis (CCA): a new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper

Scientometrics(2020)10.1007/s11192-020-03495-5Source: DataRank Database

Correction to: Citation concept analysis (CCA): a new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper is a research paper published in Scientometrics (2020). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.241. It has been cited 4 times.

N/A
0.241DataRank · unranked

Scored on demand from live citation data

Open Access4 citations
Cite:

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (1/2)
  • Open Access
Interoperable (0/2)
    Reusable (0/3)

      FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

      Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

      We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

      DataRank Breakdown

      Base Score 100%Citation Network 0%

      Base Score Contribution

      0.241

      From this paper's citation signal

      Citation Network Contribution

      0

      Citation network not refreshed for this result

      This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.

      Learn more about DataRank methodology →

      Authors (3)

      K. Brad WrayORCID,Robin HaunschildORCID,Lutz BornmannORCID

      Related Papers (5)

      What do citation counts measure? An updated review of studies on citations in scientific documents published between 2006 and 2018
      N/A
      1.1DataRank · unranked
      Scientometrics(2019)
      co-citedsame journal
      10.1007/s11192-019-03243-4
      Citation concept analysis (CCA): a new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper
      N/A
      0.604DataRank · unranked
      Scientometrics(2019)
      co-citedsame journal
      10.1007/s11192-019-03326-2
      Characterizing in-text citations in scientific articles: A large-scale analysis
      N/A
      4.8DataRank · unranked
      Journal of Informetrics(2018)
      co-cited
      10.1016/j.joi.2017.11.005
      Citation concept analysis (CCA) of Robert K. Merton’s book Social Theory and Social Structure: How often are certain concepts from the book cited in subsequent publications?
      N/A
      0.569DataRank · unranked
      Quantitative Science Studies(2020)
      co-cited
      10.1162/qss_a_00029
      What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior
      N/A
      1.1DataRank · unranked
      Journal of Documentation(2008)
      co-cited
      10.1108/00220410810844150