🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

Identifying centromeric satellites with dna-brnn

Bioinformatics(2019)10.1093/bioinformatics/btz264Source: DataRank Database

Identifying centromeric satellites with dna-brnn is a research paper published in Bioinformatics (2019). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.3. It has been cited 34 times, with 25 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 74/100.

N/A
1.3DataRank · unranked
1.3
Open Access34 citations · base score 3.6
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

SummaryHuman alpha satellite and satellite 2/3 contribute to several percent of the human genome. However, identifying these sequences with traditional algorithms is computationally intensive. Here we develop dna-brnn, a recurrent neural network to learn the sequences of the two classes of centromeric repeats. It achieves high similarity to RepeatMasker and is times faster. Dna-brnn explores a novel application of deep learning and may accelerate the study of the evolution of the two repeat classes.Availability and implementationhttps://github.com/lh3/dna-nn.

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (1/2)
  • Open Access
Interoperable (0/2)
    Reusable (0/3)

      FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

      74FAIR score
      F Findable
      100
      A Accessible
      70
      I Interoperable
      100
      R Reusable
      25
      Top 1% by FAIRdeterministic⚠ abstract only
      Estimated from the abstract only. The agent couldn't read this paper's full text, so body-dependent criteria (data-availability statement, formats, license) are inferred. For a confident score, upload the PDF or supply full text →

      Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →

      DataRank Breakdown

      Base Score 41%Citation Network 59%

      Base Score Contribution

      0.533

      From this paper's citation signal

      Citation Network Contribution

      0.775

      From 23 citing papers with measurable signal

      Learn more about DataRank methodology →

      Top 5 citers driving the network score

      Ranked by citation count — the same ordering the engine uses when summing log1p(Cq) over citers.

      1. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences
        Nucleic Acids Research19999,791 citationsDataRank 1.4
      2. The complete sequence of a human Y chromosome
        Nature2023452 citationsDataRank 5.2Top 28%
      3. A Draft Human Pangenome Reference
        202274 citationsDataRank 2.9Top 33%
      Why this DataRank?

      DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 41% comes from its base citations and 59% from the citation network (23 citing papers contributed measurable signal).

      Base score B(p)
      log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
      Network N(p)
      Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
      Damping factor d = 0.85
      DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
      Self-citations excluded
      Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

      Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

      Read the full methodology →

      Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.

      Node colors:CenterData PaperData + Open AccessNon-dataSelected & links| Node size = percentile rank

      Authors (1)