🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

Systematic evaluation of environmental factors: persistent pollutants and nutrients correlated with serum lipid levels

International Journal of Epidemiology(2012)10.1093/ije/dys003Source: DataRank Database

Systematic evaluation of environmental factors: persistent pollutants and nutrients correlated with serum lipid levels is a research paper published in International Journal of Epidemiology (2012). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 5.8. It has been cited 148 times, with 109 citing works in its 1-hop citation network.

N/A
5.8DataRank · unranked
5.8
Open Access148 citations · base score 5.0
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

BackgroundBoth genetic and environmental factors contribute to triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels. Although genome-wide association studies are currently testing the genetic factors systematically, testing and reporting one or a few factors at a time can lead to fragmented literature for environmental chemical factors. We screened for correlation between environmental factors and lipid levels, utilizing four independent surveys with information on 188 environmental factors from the Centers of Disease Control, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, collected between 1999 and 2006.MethodsWe used linear regression to correlate each environmental chemical factor to triglycerides, LDL-C and HDL-C adjusting for age, age(2), sex, ethnicity, socio-economic status and body mass index. Final estimates were adjusted for waist circumference, diabetes status, blood pressure and survey. Multiple comparisons were controlled for by estimating the false discovery rate and significant findings were tentatively validated in an independent survey.ResultsWe identified and validated 29, 9 and 17 environmental factors correlated with triglycerides, LDL-C and HDL-C levels, respectively. Findings include hydrocarbons and nicotine associated with lower HDL-C and vitamin E (γ-tocopherol) associated with unfavourable lipid levels. Higher triglycerides and lower HDL-C were correlated with higher levels of fat-soluble contaminants (e.g. polychlorinated biphenyls and dibenzofurans). Nutrients and vitamin markers (e.g. vitamins B, D and carotenes), were associated with favourable triglyceride and HDL-C levels.ConclusionsOur systematic association study has enabled us to postulate about broad environmental correlation to lipid levels. Although subject to confounding and reverse causality bias, these findings merit evaluation in additional cohorts.

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (1/2)
  • Open Access
Interoperable (0/2)
    Reusable (0/3)

      FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

      DataRank Breakdown

      Base Score 13%Citation Network 87%

      Base Score Contribution

      0.751

      From this paper's citation signal

      Citation Network Contribution

      5.0

      From 91 citing papers with measurable signal

      Learn more about DataRank methodology →

      Top 5 citers driving the network score

      Ranked by citation count — the same ordering the engine uses when summing log1p(Cq) over citers.

      Why this DataRank?

      DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 13% comes from its base citations and 87% from the citation network (91 citing papers contributed measurable signal).

      Base score B(p)
      log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
      Network N(p)
      Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
      Damping factor d = 0.85
      DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
      Self-citations excluded
      Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

      Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

      Read the full methodology →

      Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.

      Node colors:CenterData PaperData + Open AccessNon-dataSelected & links| Node size = percentile rank

      Related Papers (10)

      PLoS Medicine(2005)
      co-cited
      10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
      Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology(1995)
      co-cited
      10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
      BMJ(2013)
      co-cited
      10.1136/bmj.f6698
      Epidemiology(2008)
      co-cited
      10.1097/ede.0b013e31818131e7