🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

Transcriptomic signatures across human tissues identify functional rare genetic variation

Science(2020)10.1126/science.aaz5900Source: DataRank Database

Transcriptomic signatures across human tissues identify functional rare genetic variation is a research paper published in Science (2020). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 5.0. It has been cited 166 times, with 125 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 74/100.

N/A
5.0DataRank · unranked
5.0
Open Access166 citations · base score 5.1
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

Rare genetic variants are abundant across the human genome, and identifying their function and phenotypic impact is a major challenge. Measuring aberrant gene expression has aided in identifying functional, large-effect rare variants (RVs). Here, we expanded detection of genetically driven transcriptome abnormalities by analyzing gene expression, allele-specific expression, and alternative splicing from multitissue RNA-sequencing data, and demonstrate that each signal informs unique classes of RVs. We developed Watershed, a probabilistic model that integrates multiple genomic and transcriptomic signals to predict variant function, validated these predictions in additional cohorts and through experimental assays, and used them to assess RVs in the UK Biobank, the Million Veterans Program, and the Jackson Heart Study. Our results link thousands of RVs to diverse molecular effects and provide evidence to associate RVs affecting the transcriptome with human traits.

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (1/2)
  • Open Access
Interoperable (0/2)
    Reusable (0/3)

      FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

      74FAIR score
      F Findable
      100
      A Accessible
      70
      I Interoperable
      100
      R Reusable
      25
      Top 1% by FAIRdeterministic⚠ abstract only
      Estimated from the abstract only. The agent couldn't read this paper's full text, so body-dependent criteria (data-availability statement, formats, license) are inferred. For a confident score, upload the PDF or supply full text →

      Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →

      DataRank Breakdown

      Base Score 15%Citation Network 85%

      Base Score Contribution

      0.768

      From this paper's citation signal

      Citation Network Contribution

      4.3

      From 103 citing papers with measurable signal

      Learn more about DataRank methodology →

      Top 5 citers driving the network score

      Ranked by citation count — the same ordering the engine uses when summing log1p(Cq) over citers.

      1. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools
        Bioinformatics200966,179 citationsDataRank 1.7
      2. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
        Bioinformatics201355,202 citationsDataRank 1.6
      3. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases
        Nature Methods200910,766 citationsDataRank 1.4
      Why this DataRank?

      DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 15% comes from its base citations and 85% from the citation network (103 citing papers contributed measurable signal).

      Base score B(p)
      log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
      Network N(p)
      Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
      Damping factor d = 0.85
      DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
      Self-citations excluded
      Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

      Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

      Read the full methodology →

      Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.

      Node colors:CenterData PaperData + Open AccessNon-dataSelected & links| Node size = percentile rank

      Authors (188)